In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”

RogerEbert.com

Thumb large yjdat9k3fku1itabgixl6yvlsve

Wonderstruck

Despite what the title suggests, Wonderstruck represents a rare disappointment from master filmmaker Todd Haynes.

Thumb same kind of different as me

Same Kind of Different as Me

It can be hard to disagree with the heart and events of this true tale, except for when the movie reveals itself to be mighty…

Other Reviews
Review Archives
Thumb xbepftvyieurxopaxyzgtgtkwgw

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…

Other Reviews
Great Movie Archives
Other Articles
Chaz's Journal Archives
Other Articles
Blog Archives
Primary georgemiller2 xlarge

If We Picked the Winners 2016: Best Director

In anticipation of the Academy Awards, we polled our contributors to see who they thought should win the Oscar. Once we had our winners, we asked various writers to make the case for our selection in each category. Glenn Kenny writes about our landslide pick for the Best Director of 2015, Mr. George Miller.


Critics and cinephiles like to call their favorite directors “visionaries,” but let’s have some real talk: all the vision in the world isn’t going to amount to much on the screen if craft is absent. And contemporary cinema is packed with would-be visionaries who wouldn’t know a 28mm lens from a novelty shot glass. George Miller’s return to live-action directing, reconfiguring the action hero who made his low-budget name all the way back in 1979 with “Mad Max,” is a dynamic combination of craft and vision. Upon release, more than one top filmmaker was heard to comment, in an interview or on a social media thread, that Miller was once again showing everybody in film “how it was done.” 

Advertisement

And how was this mind-blowing action movie done? Despite popular perception, Miller was not 100 percent “old-school” in his approach. Like any really good conscientious craftsman he took into account all the latest innovations in shooting, editing and effects technology and he picked and chose those elements that could best serve his, yes, vision. Because his cutting is so coherent, it’s said that he abjures the apparently much-hated kitchen sink pyrotechnics of what many refer to as “chaos cinema.” Yes and no: Miller clearly understands the exhilaration potential of a particular visual barrage but chooses—insists on—contriving it in a way that makes sense to his eye, to his particular rhythm. It’s the painstaking realization of a way of seeing that makes “Mad Max: Fury Road” the most distinctive piece of film direction of 2015. 

Popular Blog Posts

"Blade Runner" vs. "Blade Runner 2049"

A Great Movie is hidden somewhere within "Blade Runner" and "Blade Runner 2049."

The Fall of Toxic Masculinity and the Rise of Feminine Consciousness

A special edition of Thumbnails detailing the recent sexual harassment cases in the entertainment and tech industries...

Oscars Could Be Facing Dearth of Diversity Yet Again

A column on the lack of diversity in this year's potential Oscar nominees.

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus